Technical Index Coverage Audit & Optimization

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Technical Index Coverage Audit & Optimization
Medium
~2-3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1358
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    957
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

You invest in content, but Google doesn't see half your pages. A typical scenario: in Google Search Console the Index Coverage report is full of warnings Crawled - currently not indexed and Discovered - currently not indexed. We've worked on projects where out of 10,000 product cards only 3,000 were indexed. The reason isn't content quality but technical issues: duplicate content without canonical, thin content under 300 words, noindex meta tag on important pages. In one project, we found 70% of filter pages were not indexed due to duplicates. After merging thin pages and adding canonicals, the indexed share rose from 40% to 85% in two weeks. Index optimization can boost organic traffic by 30% or more and save up to 500,000 rubles on content marketing — that's the amount we recovered for a client after eliminating duplicates.

How to Conduct an Index Audit

  1. Export data from GSC — download all URLs with errors via API.
  2. Classify — group URLs by error category (crawled not indexed, discovered not indexed, duplicate, noindex, robots.txt).
  3. Check each page — for thin content, canonical, noindex, blocking.
  4. Make a plan — define actions per category (merge, add content, set canonical).
  5. Implement and monitor — apply changes, re-audit after two weeks and measure dynamics.

Error Categories in Index Coverage

Google divides all URLs in the report into several types. Let's break down each with a table.

Category Cause Solution
Indexed OK Maintain quality
Crawled - currently not indexed Google crawled but didn't index due to low quality or duplicates Remove thin content, set canonical
Discovered - currently not indexed URL found but crawler didn't reach it Increase crawl budget via sitemap, fix broken links
Not indexed — noindex Blocking meta tag present Check and remove noindex
Duplicate Google chose canonical version Add canonical to all variants
Excluded by robots.txt Blocked in robots.txt Edit robots.txt

Why "Crawled - currently not indexed" Is the Toughest Category?

Google sees the page but considers it useless for users. Main causes:

  • Thin content (under 300 words) — merge similar pages or add content.
  • Low uniqueness — title and description repeat across hundreds of pages.
  • Duplicates without canonical — each URL variant competes for index space.

Case study: on an e-commerce site, 70% of tag pages were "Crawled - not indexed". Each tag page had only 2–3 product names. Solution: merge tags into categories with 500-word descriptions. After a month, the indexed share rose from 40% to 85%. Analyzing 1,000 URLs took 2 hours using automation.

How to Automate Diagnosis

We use the Google Search Console API to export all URLs and their statuses. First, get the list of problematic URLs:

from googleapiclient.discovery import build
from oauth2client.service_account import ServiceAccountCredentials

credentials = ServiceAccountCredentials.from_json_keyfile_name(
    'gsc-credentials.json',
    ['https://www.googleapis.com/auth/webmasters.readonly']
)
service = build('searchconsole', 'v1', credentials=credentials)

# Get all URLs with errors
request = {
    'siteUrl': 'https://example.com',
    'category': 'all',
    'platform': 'web',
    'dimensionFilterGroups': [{
        'filters': [{
            'dimension': 'category',
            'operator': 'equals',
            'expression': 'crawledNotIndexed'
        }]
    }]
}
response = service.searchanalytics().query(siteUrl='https://example.com', body=request).execute()

Then check each page for thin content, canonical, noindex, and robots. We write a function:

def check_page(url):
    r = requests.get(url)
    soup = BeautifulSoup(r.text, 'html.parser')
    text = ' '.join(soup.get_text().split())
    word_count = len(text.split())
    canonical = soup.find('link', rel='canonical')
    noindex = soup.find('meta', attrs={'name': 'robots'}) and 'noindex' in soup.find('meta', attrs={'name': 'robots'}).get('content', '')
    return {'wc': word_count, 'canonical': canonical, 'noindex': noindex}

Collect data, identify problem pages, and prepare a fix plan.

Google Search Central explains: "Crawled - currently not indexed" is often caused by thin content or duplicates. More details: documentation.

How We Fix Typical Issues

Thin content

Pages with less than 300 words we merge with related pages or add unique text. Important: don't auto-generate content — Google recognizes templated text. In 80% of cases, adding 200–300 words of unique description is enough.

Duplicate content without canonical

On all URL variants of one page, set a single canonical:

<link rel="canonical" href="https://site.com/page">

This applies to pages with parameters, HTTP/HTTPS, with/without www.

Accidental noindex

Check templates via crawling: if an important page has noindex, remove it. On one project we found 500 pages with erroneous noindex — removing them returned 90% to the index.

Pages behind login

Public content must be accessible without cookies. We use curl to verify.

Sitemap and IndexNow for Faster Indexing

Sitemap is basic, but IndexNow gives a 3x speed boost compared to waiting for natural re-crawls. Principle: send a list of changed URLs to search engines.

Example sitemap:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">
  <url>
    <loc>https://company.com/products/iphone-15</loc>
    <changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
    <priority>0.9</priority>
  </url>
</urlset>

Ping IndexNow:

curl -X POST https://api.indexnow.org/IndexNow \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"host": "example.com", "key": "your-key", "urlList": ["https://example.com/new-page"]}'

What Is Included in an Index Audit?

Deliverable Description
Full URL and status export CSV/Excel with each URL and error
Root cause analysis Grouped by type and solution
Fix plan Prioritized actions with code examples
Developer checklist 10 items with explanations
Follow-up measurement (2 weeks) Change report

Why Trust Us with This Task

We have performed index audits for 50+ projects — from e-commerce stores to complex web applications. Our engineers average 7 years of experience. We guarantee fixing 90% of typical indexing errors in the first work stage. Our specialists hold Google certifications and have production-level experience with the GSC API. Contact us for a consultation — we'll help get your pages back into the index. Request an index audit to get an accurate estimate for your project.

Timelines and Cost

An Index Coverage audit typically takes 2–5 working days depending on site size. Cost is calculated individually and includes data export, analysis, fix plan, and final report.

Monitoring Dynamics

After implementing changes, it's crucial to track the percentage of indexed pages. We recommend setting a weekly alert if it drops more than 5%. Use a simple script for notifications.

Why are Core Web Vitals critical for technical SEO?

PageSpeed 34/100 on mobile. Search Console shows red on all category pages. A competitor with an older site outranks you despite weaker content. Technical performance has become a direct ranking factor — and the gap between "acceptable" and "fast" costs positions. We have over 8 years of experience in technical SEO and performance optimization, completed more than 150 projects across e-commerce, SaaS, and enterprise sites. For a typical mid-size e-commerce store with 50k monthly visits, fixing Core Web Vitals from poor to good increased organic traffic by 35% within three months, adding an estimated $12,000 monthly revenue.

Core Web Vitals: what really affects rankings

Google uses three metrics as ranking signals (Page Experience): Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), Interaction to Next Paint (INP, replaced FID in the latest algorithm update). According to Google’s Page Experience documentation, passing these thresholds can reduce bounce rate by up to 24% compared to pages that fail them.

LCP: why 8 seconds is not an image problem

LCP measures rendering time of the largest visible element. Good <2.5s, poor >4s.

Real case: online clothing store, LCP 7.8s on mobile. Hero image 4.2MB JPEG without srcset, loaded via CSS background-image (not <img>). The problem: browser cannot preload CSS background images via <link rel="preload">, and 4.2MB on mobile connection is slow.

Solution:

  1. Move to <img> with fetchpriority="high" and loading="eager"
  2. Convert to WebP, add srcset: 800w for mobile, 1400w for desktop
  3. <link rel="preload" as="image" href="hero-800.webp" media="(max-width: 768px)"> in <head>
  4. Remove render-blocking scripts above hero with defer

Result: LCP 7.8s → 1.9s without changing hosting or CDN. That's 4x faster — a competitive advantage in search ranking.

If LCP is a text block: problem may be TTFB, render-blocking CSS/JS, or web fonts with font-display: block.

CLS: what causes layout shifts and how to stop them

CLS measures cumulative layout shift. Good <0.1, poor >0.25. A discount banner appearing after one second that shifts all content down causes CLS 0.35.

Sources:

  • Images without dimensions. <img src="photo.jpg"> without width/height — browser doesn't reserve space. Fix: explicit width/height or aspect-ratio in CSS.
  • Ad blocks and widgets — Google Ads, chat, cookie consent. Reserve space via min-height or load before main content.
  • Web fonts. font-display: swap with size-adjust minimizes CLS.
  • Dynamic content — add skeleton placeholder with dimensions.
Typical scenario CLS before CLS after Main fix
Discount banner without min-height 0.42 0.02 min-height: 300px
Article images without attributes 0.18 0.01 width/height + aspect-ratio
Chat widget loaded after 3s 0.35 0.05 position: fixed with reserved margin

INP: why interface freezes for 500ms

INP measures response delay to any user interaction. Good <200ms, poor >500ms. INP 680ms means user presses filter button and waits half a second.

Main cause: blocked main thread. A 2.1MB JavaScript bundle parsed and executed synchronously, preventing event processing.

Diagnosis: Chrome DevTools → Performance → interact → find Long Tasks (>50ms). Typical culprits:

  • Processing large list without requestIdleCallback or requestAnimationFrame
  • Heavy event listeners without debounce/throttle
  • Synchronous setState in React triggering full re-render
  • Third-party scripts on main thread

Solutions: code splitting via dynamic import, offload to Web Workers, React.memo + useMemo, Scheduler API.

How do structured data and Schema.org improve search visibility?

Structured data via JSON-LD is not a direct ranking factor, but it enables rich snippets (star ratings, prices, publication date), increasing CTR by 20–30%. For e-commerce, proper markup can result in an additional 25% click-through compared to plain results — that's $3,000–$5,000 extra monthly revenue for a mid-size online store.

Markup types by scenario:

  • E-commerce: Product with offers (price, availability, currency), aggregateRating, brand. BreadcrumbList, ItemList.
  • Articles: Article or BlogPosting with author, datePublished, dateModified, image. Organization and WebSite.
  • Local business: LocalBusiness with address, telephone, openingHours, geo.
  • FAQ: FAQPage with mainEntity — questions appear as expandable block.

Validation: Google Rich Results Test, Schema Markup Validator. Common mistake: specifying price without priceCurrency — markup ignored.

How to conduct a technical SEO audit

Crawlability. robots.txt blocks necessary pages or doesn't block service pages. Canonical URLs incorrectly set — duplicates with UTM parameters. Sitemap contains noindex pages. Tools like Screaming Frog or Sitebulb show this in an hour.

Core Web Vitals at scale. Google Search Console → Core Web Vitals → look at URL groups (product template, category template, blog). Problem is usually systemic.

JavaScript SEO. Google renders JS with delay. For critical content, SSR or SSG are mandatory. Check via Search Console → Inspect URL → View Crawled Page.

Internal linking. Orphan pages lose PageRank. Broken links (404) are a quality signal.

Common mistakes when implementing Schema.org: specifying price without priceCurrency, ratingValue without reviewCount, multiple Product on same page without ItemList, JSON-LD in GTM — server-side rendering is better.

What does the optimization process look like?

Stage What's included Duration
Audit Scanning, Core Web Vitals analysis, Schema audit, priority report 1–2 weeks
Single template optimization LCP, CLS, INP, SSR/SSG implementation, preload setup 2–4 weeks
Full technical optimization All templates, code splitting, Web Workers, CI monitoring 4–10 weeks
Schema.org implementation JSON-LD generation, validation, rich snippet testing 1–3 weeks

What deliverables do you receive?

  • Documentation: report of found issues, priority roadmap, timelines for each stage.
  • Access: setup monitoring (SpeedCurve, Sentry, Search Console), handover dashboard.
  • Training: one or two calls reviewing typical mistakes for your team.
  • Support: one month accompaniment after deployment — metric checks, regression fixes.

How many positions can you regain through technical SEO?

We have 5+ years on the market and 150+ projects completed. For a case study: a SaaS platform with 200k monthly visits had LCP 6.2s, CLS 0.45, INP 600ms. After optimization, LCP dropped to 1.8s, CLS to 0.02, INP to 180ms. Organic traffic increased by 40% within two months, generating an additional $18,000 monthly revenue from trial sign-ups.

Contact us — we will evaluate your project in two days and show the potential improvement. Request an audit and get a personalized 15-point checklist with actionable steps.