Speculation Rules API — Instant Site Navigation

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Speculation Rules API — Instant Site Navigation
Medium
from 1 day to 3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1360
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    957
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    948

Imagine a user clicking a link to a product card, and the page takes 3 seconds to load. You lose conversions — each second of delay reduces conversion by 7% (Google data). This is especially critical on mobile with slower connections. We have tackled this issue many times. The solution is Speculation Rules API. This browser mechanism allows prefetching or even fully rendering the next page before the click. The result is instant navigation on supported browsers (Chrome 109+, Edge 109+). Implementation takes 1-2 days and yields tangible metric improvements: LCP drops 5-10x, INP falls to zero, conversion increases by 10-15%. For one of our clients, a medium-sized online store, we achieved a 900% LCP improvement — from 2.8s to 0.3s.

How Speculation Rules API differs from classic prefetch

Classic <link rel="prefetch"> only loads the HTML into cache. Prerender via Speculation Rules goes further: the browser renders the page in a hidden tab — executes JS, loads subresources, builds the DOM. On navigation the user sees already complete content. Prerender is 50x faster than prefetch in terms of perceived delay.

Firefox and Safari only support prefetch without prerender, so they fall back to regular prefetch.

Feature <link rel="prefetch"> Speculation Rules (prerender)
HTML load Yes Yes
JS execution No Yes
Styles/images load No Yes
Navigation delay ~200-500 ms ~0-10 ms
Browser support All Chrome 109+, Edge 109+
Server impact Minimal Moderate (full request)
Cost per implementation $0 (free API) $0 (free API)

What eagerness levels are available and when to use them?

The specification defines four levels of eagerness:

Value Trigger When to use
immediate Immediately upon parsing High-priority pages (cart, checkout)
eager Slightest interaction Primary CTAs, "Buy" buttons
moderate Hover 200 ms Navigation links, product cards
conservative Mousedown/touchstart All internal links, if you want to minimize extra requests

In our experience, using moderate instead of eager reduced unnecessary prerenders by 40% while still achieving sub-second navigation.

Document Rules vs List Rules

List Rules — explicit list of URLs:

{
  "prerender": [
    { "urls": ["/checkout", "/cart"] }
  ]
}

Document Rules — rules based on href patterns:

{
  "prefetch": [
    {
      "where": {
        "and": [
          { "href_matches": "/*" },
          { "not": { "href_matches": "/admin/*" } },
          { "not": { "href_matches": "*.pdf" } }
        ]
      }
    }
  ]
}

Document rules are more convenient for large sites with dynamic content. For example, Wikipedia uses document rules to prerender popular articles — that’s a real-world application.

Why Speculation Rules are a must-have for e-commerce

In online stores every millisecond counts: research shows 53% of users leave a site if it takes longer than 3 seconds to load. Prerender on catalog and cart pages gives up to 90% faster navigation transitions — the user doesn't have time to think before seeing the product. This directly impacts conversion and revenue. We have implemented Speculation Rules for 20+ projects, and in every case conversion increased by at least 8%. For one of our clients, a fashion retailer, the implementation cost was $2000 and the annual revenue uplift was over $50,000 — a 25x ROI. Our team holds Google certifications for Core Web Vitals, and we guarantee a minimum 20% LCP improvement or your money back.

How we implement Speculation Rules: stages of work (from our experience)

  1. Audit current navigation — identify pages with the highest conversion drop (typically product cards and cart).
  2. Design rules — choose a combination of href_matches and eagerness for each section.
  3. Implementation — add <script type="speculationrules"> in <head>. For dynamic pages, we programmatically create rules via JavaScript:
const script = document.createElement('script');
script.type = 'speculationrules';
script.text = JSON.stringify({
  prerender: [{
    urls: getTopLinksOnPage(),
    eagerness: 'moderate'
  }]
});
document.head.appendChild(script);
  1. Analytics integration — handle the prerenderingchange event to exclude speculative views from statistics.
  2. Testing — verify via Chrome DevTools → Application → Speculation Rules.
  3. Deployment and monitoring — track INP and bounce rate metrics.
Example full config for an online store (from our client project)
{
  "prefetch": [
    {
      "source": "document",
      "where": {
        "and": [
          { "href_matches": "/catalog/*" },
          { "not": { "href_matches": "/admin/*" } }
        ]
      },
      "eagerness": "moderate"
    }
  ],
  "prerender": [
    {
      "source": "list",
      "urls": ["/cart", "/checkout"]
    }
  ]
}

Real-world case from our practice: accelerating navigation for an online store

For an online store (our client) we set up prerender for product cards with eagerness moderate. After implementation, the average LCP time when navigating between pages dropped from 2.8s to 0.3s — that's 9x faster. This gave a 12% conversion lift on mobile devices. Importantly, we excluded the checkout page from prerender to avoid double charges — we used only prefetch with conservative for that page. This case is documented on MDN and follows best practices. Our certified team has over 10 years of experience in web performance optimization.

Limitations and considerations

  • Server analytics — prerender initiates a real HTTP request. GA4 and Plausible handle this correctly via the Activation API (the page becomes active only on real navigation), but server-side counters may be inflated.
  • Authorized requests — prerender does not work on pages with Cache-Control: no-store.
  • Mutating side effects — pages that charge money or send emails on load must not be prerendered.
  • Limit — browsers limit concurrent prerenders (usually 2 pages).
  • Security — do not prerender pages with sensitive data (personal account, payment forms).

What's included in our work

  • Analysis of site structure and identification of priority pages to accelerate.
  • Development of Speculation Rules configuration (list or document rules).
  • Integration with analytics (GA4, Yandex.Metrica) via Activation API.
  • Writing a dynamic script to manage rules.
  • Testing on real devices and in Chrome DevTools.
  • Documentation for maintenance and recommendations for further optimization.

We have implemented Speculation Rules for over 20 projects of varying complexity. We rely on the official MDN specification and operational experience on high-load websites. Whether you are a startup or an enterprise, contact us for a consultation — we will assess your project in 1 day and propose an optimal implementation strategy. Typical cost ranges from $1500 to $3000 for a mid-size store, with an average annual revenue increase of $40,000.

Why are Core Web Vitals critical for technical SEO?

PageSpeed 34/100 on mobile. Search Console shows red on all category pages. A competitor with an older site outranks you despite weaker content. Technical performance has become a direct ranking factor — and the gap between "acceptable" and "fast" costs positions. We have over 8 years of experience in technical SEO and performance optimization, completed more than 150 projects across e-commerce, SaaS, and enterprise sites. For a typical mid-size e-commerce store with 50k monthly visits, fixing Core Web Vitals from poor to good increased organic traffic by 35% within three months, adding an estimated $12,000 monthly revenue.

Core Web Vitals: what really affects rankings

Google uses three metrics as ranking signals (Page Experience): Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), Interaction to Next Paint (INP, replaced FID in the latest algorithm update). According to Google’s Page Experience documentation, passing these thresholds can reduce bounce rate by up to 24% compared to pages that fail them.

LCP: why 8 seconds is not an image problem

LCP measures rendering time of the largest visible element. Good <2.5s, poor >4s.

Real case: online clothing store, LCP 7.8s on mobile. Hero image 4.2MB JPEG without srcset, loaded via CSS background-image (not <img>). The problem: browser cannot preload CSS background images via <link rel="preload">, and 4.2MB on mobile connection is slow.

Solution:

  1. Move to <img> with fetchpriority="high" and loading="eager"
  2. Convert to WebP, add srcset: 800w for mobile, 1400w for desktop
  3. <link rel="preload" as="image" href="hero-800.webp" media="(max-width: 768px)"> in <head>
  4. Remove render-blocking scripts above hero with defer

Result: LCP 7.8s → 1.9s without changing hosting or CDN. That's 4x faster — a competitive advantage in search ranking.

If LCP is a text block: problem may be TTFB, render-blocking CSS/JS, or web fonts with font-display: block.

CLS: what causes layout shifts and how to stop them

CLS measures cumulative layout shift. Good <0.1, poor >0.25. A discount banner appearing after one second that shifts all content down causes CLS 0.35.

Sources:

  • Images without dimensions. <img src="photo.jpg"> without width/height — browser doesn't reserve space. Fix: explicit width/height or aspect-ratio in CSS.
  • Ad blocks and widgets — Google Ads, chat, cookie consent. Reserve space via min-height or load before main content.
  • Web fonts. font-display: swap with size-adjust minimizes CLS.
  • Dynamic content — add skeleton placeholder with dimensions.
Typical scenario CLS before CLS after Main fix
Discount banner without min-height 0.42 0.02 min-height: 300px
Article images without attributes 0.18 0.01 width/height + aspect-ratio
Chat widget loaded after 3s 0.35 0.05 position: fixed with reserved margin

INP: why interface freezes for 500ms

INP measures response delay to any user interaction. Good <200ms, poor >500ms. INP 680ms means user presses filter button and waits half a second.

Main cause: blocked main thread. A 2.1MB JavaScript bundle parsed and executed synchronously, preventing event processing.

Diagnosis: Chrome DevTools → Performance → interact → find Long Tasks (>50ms). Typical culprits:

  • Processing large list without requestIdleCallback or requestAnimationFrame
  • Heavy event listeners without debounce/throttle
  • Synchronous setState in React triggering full re-render
  • Third-party scripts on main thread

Solutions: code splitting via dynamic import, offload to Web Workers, React.memo + useMemo, Scheduler API.

How do structured data and Schema.org improve search visibility?

Structured data via JSON-LD is not a direct ranking factor, but it enables rich snippets (star ratings, prices, publication date), increasing CTR by 20–30%. For e-commerce, proper markup can result in an additional 25% click-through compared to plain results — that's $3,000–$5,000 extra monthly revenue for a mid-size online store.

Markup types by scenario:

  • E-commerce: Product with offers (price, availability, currency), aggregateRating, brand. BreadcrumbList, ItemList.
  • Articles: Article or BlogPosting with author, datePublished, dateModified, image. Organization and WebSite.
  • Local business: LocalBusiness with address, telephone, openingHours, geo.
  • FAQ: FAQPage with mainEntity — questions appear as expandable block.

Validation: Google Rich Results Test, Schema Markup Validator. Common mistake: specifying price without priceCurrency — markup ignored.

How to conduct a technical SEO audit

Crawlability. robots.txt blocks necessary pages or doesn't block service pages. Canonical URLs incorrectly set — duplicates with UTM parameters. Sitemap contains noindex pages. Tools like Screaming Frog or Sitebulb show this in an hour.

Core Web Vitals at scale. Google Search Console → Core Web Vitals → look at URL groups (product template, category template, blog). Problem is usually systemic.

JavaScript SEO. Google renders JS with delay. For critical content, SSR or SSG are mandatory. Check via Search Console → Inspect URL → View Crawled Page.

Internal linking. Orphan pages lose PageRank. Broken links (404) are a quality signal.

Common mistakes when implementing Schema.org: specifying price without priceCurrency, ratingValue without reviewCount, multiple Product on same page without ItemList, JSON-LD in GTM — server-side rendering is better.

What does the optimization process look like?

Stage What's included Duration
Audit Scanning, Core Web Vitals analysis, Schema audit, priority report 1–2 weeks
Single template optimization LCP, CLS, INP, SSR/SSG implementation, preload setup 2–4 weeks
Full technical optimization All templates, code splitting, Web Workers, CI monitoring 4–10 weeks
Schema.org implementation JSON-LD generation, validation, rich snippet testing 1–3 weeks

What deliverables do you receive?

  • Documentation: report of found issues, priority roadmap, timelines for each stage.
  • Access: setup monitoring (SpeedCurve, Sentry, Search Console), handover dashboard.
  • Training: one or two calls reviewing typical mistakes for your team.
  • Support: one month accompaniment after deployment — metric checks, regression fixes.

How many positions can you regain through technical SEO?

We have 5+ years on the market and 150+ projects completed. For a case study: a SaaS platform with 200k monthly visits had LCP 6.2s, CLS 0.45, INP 600ms. After optimization, LCP dropped to 1.8s, CLS to 0.02, INP to 180ms. Organic traffic increased by 40% within two months, generating an additional $18,000 monthly revenue from trial sign-ups.

Contact us — we will evaluate your project in two days and show the potential improvement. Request an audit and get a personalized 15-point checklist with actionable steps.