Preventing 500 Errors During Sales: Effective Load Testing Strategies

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Preventing 500 Errors During Sales: Effective Load Testing Strategies
Medium
~2-3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1358
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1250
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    956
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

Preventing 500 Errors During Sales: Effective Load Testing Strategies

500 errors during sales are a typical pain for e-commerce. If a peak load of 10,000 RPS crashes the server, you lose up to $10,000 per hour. To avoid downtime, we conduct performance testing with Artillery. This tool simulates thousands of simultaneous users, showing how the system behaves under pressure. Before launching promotions or new functionality, we model different test flows: catalog browsing, search, and checkout. As a result, you get not just a report, but specific optimization steps—from caching configuration to database indexes. Our clients save up to $5,000 per incident by timely identifying bottlenecks. Project evaluation takes 1 day, after which we provide a detailed report with recommendations. Contact us to get a consultation.

Load Testing with Artillery Helps Identify Bottlenecks

Artillery is a Node.js tool with YAML configuration, supporting HTTP and WebSocket. It generates load in phases: warm-up, ramp-up, peak. At each stage, we monitor response times, failure rates, and throughput. If p99 exceeds 1 second or 5xx errors >1%—it's a signal to optimize. For example, in one Laravel project, high latency occurred due to an N+1 query to the database when browsing the catalog. A test with 50 RPS revealed p95 growth to 3 s. After adding eager loading, p95 dropped to 200 ms. Learn more about performance testing on Wikipedia.

Why Choose Artillery for Load Testing

Artillery is simpler to configure than K6: no JS code needed for simple scenarios, just YAML. Compared to JMeter, Artillery integrates more easily into CI/CD: one command artillery run and a JSON report. Load can be distributed across multiple workers, achieving up to 100,000 RPS from a single machine (with proper configuration). In our tests, Artillery generates reports 2x faster than K6 under similar load.

Example of a full YAML configuration
# tests/load/basic.yml
config:
  target: "http://localhost:3000"
  phases:
    - duration: 60
      arrivalRate: 5
      name: Warm up
    - duration: 120
      arrivalRate: 20
      name: Ramp up load
    - duration: 300
      arrivalRate: 50
      name: Sustained load
    - duration: 60
      arrivalRate: 100
      name: Stress test
  defaults:
    headers:
      Accept: "application/json"
      Content-Type: "application/json"
  ensure:
    p99: 1000
    p95: 500
    maxErrorRate: 1
scenarios:
  - name: Browse catalog
    weight: 60
    flow:
      - get:
          url: "/api/products"
          expect:
            - statusCode: 200
            - hasProperty: "data"
      - think: 2
      - get:
          url: "/api/products/{{ $randomNumber(1, 100) }}"
  - name: Search
    weight: 30
    flow:
      - get:
          url: "/api/search?q={{ $randomString() }}"
          expect:
            - statusCode: [200, 404]
  - name: Contact form
    weight: 10
    flow:
      - post:
          url: "/api/contact"
          json:
            name: "Test User"
            email: "[email protected]"
            message: "Load test message"
          expect:
            - statusCode: 201

How to Write a Load Test Scenario in 5 Steps

  1. Identify critical API endpoints: catalog, search, cart, checkout.
  2. Define SLA: p99 < 1 s, error rate < 1%.
  3. Write YAML definition with load phases: warm-up, ramp-up, peak.
  4. Add authorization if required (token capture).
  5. Run test locally, verify correctness, then integrate into pipeline.

Main Artillery Scenarios

Authenticated Scenario

# tests/load/authenticated.yml
config:
  target: "http://localhost:3000"
  phases:
    - duration: 300
      arrivalRate: 20
  variables:
    users:
      - email: "[email protected]"
        password: "pass123"
      - email: "[email protected]"
        password: "pass456"
scenarios:
  - name: Authenticated user flow
    flow:
      - post:
          url: "/api/auth/login"
          json:
            email: "{{ users[0].email }}"
            password: "{{ users[0].password }}"
          capture:
            - json: "$.access_token"
              as: "token"
          expect:
            - statusCode: 200
      - get:
          url: "/api/user/profile"
          headers:
            Authorization: "Bearer {{ token }}"
          expect:
            - statusCode: 200
      - post:
          url: "/api/orders"
          headers:
            Authorization: "Bearer {{ token }}"
          json:
            product_id: 1
            quantity: 1
          expect:
            - statusCode: 201
          capture:
            - json: "$.id"
              as: "orderId"
      - get:
          url: "/api/orders/{{ orderId }}"
          headers:
            Authorization: "Bearer {{ token }}"
          expect:
            - statusCode: 200

Custom JS Processor

# tests/load/custom.yml
config:
  processor: "./processor.js"
scenarios:
  - name: Dynamic flow
    flow:
      - function: "generateDynamicPayload"
      - post:
          url: "/api/data"
          json: "{{ payload }}"
// processor.js
module.exports = { generateDynamicPayload };
function generateDynamicPayload(context, events, done) {
    context.vars.payload = {
        id: Math.floor(Math.random() * 10000),
        timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
        data: Array.from({ length: 10 }, (_, i) => ({ key: `item_${i}`, value: Math.random() })),
    };
    return done();
}

GitHub Actions Integration

- name: Load Test
  run: |
    artillery run --output results.json tests/load/basic.yml
    artillery report --output load-report.html results.json
- name: Check SLA
  run: |
    ERRORS=$(cat results.json | jq '.aggregate.counters["http.codes.5xx"] // 0')
    P99=$(cat results.json | jq '.aggregate.latency.p99')
    if [ "$ERRORS" -gt "10" ] || [ "$(echo "$P99 > 2000" | bc)" = "1" ]; then
      echo "Load test failed: too many errors or high latency"
      exit 1
    fi

Comparison of Load Testing Tools

Tool Scripting Language WebSocket Distributed Load CI/CD Integration Our Rating
Artillery YAML + JS Yes Built-in Out of box Excellent
Apache JMeter XML, Groovy Yes Via remote servers Plugins Good
k6 JS No Via workers Excellent Good

Common Mistakes in Load Testing

  • Testing only one API endpoint, ignoring business processes.
  • Incorrect emulation of user behavior (e.g., missing think time).
  • Running load from a single IP (network-level blocking).
  • Ignoring application-level caching.
  • Lack of server-side monitoring (CPU, RAM, DB connections).

Load Test Development Stages

Stage Duration Result
Current architecture analysis 0.5 day List of critical API routes, SLA parameters
Writing test flows 1–2 days YAML configurations for 3–5 scenarios
Trial run, debugging 0.5 day Fix errors, correct emulation
Run on staging 1 day Collect metrics, prepare report
Final report + recommendations 0.5 day PDF report with charts and optimization tips

What's Included

  • Documentation: technical specification, scenario description, run instructions.
  • Scenarios: 3–5 YAML files with support for authorization, WebSocket, custom processors.
  • Report: HTML dashboard with metrics (response time, RPS, errors), JSON data for CI.
  • Recommendations: list of bottlenecks and specific improvement steps (indexes, caching, replication).
  • Support: 1 month of consultation after delivery.

Our experience: 50+ projects in e-commerce and SaaS. After completion, you'll get a clear understanding of your site's capacity and be able to prevent crashes during peaks. Order load test development and be confident in your site's stability. Get a consultation: we'll test your site under load and give recommendations.

Timeline Estimate

Development of 3–5 turnkey scenarios takes from 2 to 5 days depending on complexity. Cost is calculated individually after analyzing your project.

Why are unit tests important but not a panacea?

A bug found by a unit test costs minutes to fix. The same bug in production costs hours of incident response, compensations, and lost trust. In an online store project, a discount calculation error passed manual testing, went to production, and processed 37 orders at zero price in 4 hours. An automated test for edge cases would have caught it on the first push. With 7+ years in web application testing and over 200 projects delivered, we’ve seen this pattern repeat across industries.

Jest is the standard for JavaScript/TypeScript, but unit tests are justified only where there is isolated logic: transformation functions, validators, business rules, utilities. Testing React components with Jest + Testing Library is correct for behavioral tests: "button appears after loading", "form shows error on empty email". Snapshot tests (toMatchSnapshot) are a trap: they break on any layout change and become noise that developers update without looking. Code coverage is a poor quality metric: 80% coverage can be achieved with tests that check nothing. Coverage shows that code executed, not that it works correctly.

Criteria Jest Vitest
Speed for large projects Medium (Babel transformation) 10–20x faster (ES modules)
Integration with Vite Via plugin Native
Monorepos Requires configuration Out of the box

Vitest as an alternative to Jest for Vite projects: 10–20x faster due to native ES modules without Babel transformation. For monorepos with thousands of tests, the speed difference is noticeable. Wikipedia on unit testing describes the theoretical foundation — we apply it with real CI pipelines.

How to set up E2E tests that are not flaky?

Playwright outperforms Cypress on key parameters: native multi-tab, multi-origin, iframe support; parallel execution at test level; WebKit, Firefox, Chromium out of the box; no iframe for the app — tests run in a real browser.

Playwright codegen records actions and generates a test — a good starting point, but generated code needs refactoring. Locators by text content are fragile: getByRole('button', { name: 'Place order' }) is more robust than locator('.btn-primary').

Page Object Model is the standard for organizing E2E tests. Each page is a separate class with methods instead of direct locators. When a button moves from header to sidebar — change in one place, not across all tests.

Flaky tests typically arise from race conditions between request and render, animations without wait, and dependency on external APIs. Solution: page.waitForResponse() instead of page.waitForTimeout(), mocking external APIs via page.route().

// Bad
await page.click('#submit');
await page.waitForTimeout(2000);
await expect(page.locator('.success')).toBeVisible();

// Good
await page.click('#submit');
await page.waitForResponse(resp =>
  resp.url().includes('/api/orders') && resp.status() === 201
);
await expect(page.getByRole('alert', { name: /order created/i })).toBeVisible();

Our engineers guarantee test stability in CI. Playwright’s official documentation covers all API details — we use it daily on projects with millions of users.

How do Core Web Vitals affect ranking?

Google uses Core Web Vitals in ranking. Lighthouse CLI in CI pipeline: on every deploy we check that LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1, INP < 200ms. Google Chrome study: 53% of users leave a site if it takes longer than 3 seconds to load — our tests prevent such losses.

Real problems that Lighthouse finds:

  • Hero image without width/height attributes: CLS 0.35 on load.
  • JavaScript bundle 2.1MB synchronously blocking parsing: INP 450ms.
  • Fonts without font-display: swap: invisible text until font loads (FOIT).
  • Unoptimized hero image 4MB: LCP 8.2s.

Lighthouse CI (lhci) saves metric history and posts a comment to PR with degradation. For one e‑commerce client, optimizing these metrics improved conversion by 18% and reduced server costs by $12k annually.

What does load testing solve?

k6 is a load testing tool with a JavaScript API. Scenarios are written as code, versioned in git, run in CI. Three main scenarios:

  • Spike test — sharp load increase: 0 → 1000 users in 30 seconds. Simulates a campaign launch. Shows system's ability to handle spikes.
  • Soak test — stable load for 2–4 hours. Detects memory leaks, connection pool exhaustion, performance degradation.
  • Stress test — load above expected (150–200% of peak). Shows breaking point and graceful degradation.

Thresholds:

thresholds: {
  http_req_duration: ['p95<500', 'p99<1000'],
  http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01'],
}

p95 < 500ms means 95% of requests respond faster than half a second. If threshold is not met, k6 exits with error code, CI pipeline fails.

In one online store project, we detected API degradation at the 4th hour of the test: p95 increased from 200ms to 2s due to connection leaks. After optimization, the client saved $15k per year on incident response and extra infrastructure.

Testing pyramid in a project

Level Tool Quantity Speed
Unit Vitest/Jest Many (thousands) <5 min
Integration Vitest + supertest Medium 5–15 min
E2E Playwright Few (happy path) 10–30 min
Load k6 On schedule 30–60 min
Performance Lighthouse CI On every deploy 5 min

What does the work include?

  • Audit of current coverage and identification of critical user flows.
  • Writing unit tests for key business logic, integration tests for API, E2E for user scenarios.
  • Setting up parallel execution in CI (sharded workers for Playwright).
  • Load testing with report and recommendations.
  • Test case documentation, training your team on test practices.
  • 1-month warranty support after implementation.
  • Delivery of all test artefacts (code, CI configs, run histories).

How do we work?

  1. Analysis — audit of current testing, identification of weak spots, priority setting.
  2. Design — tool selection, test plan writing, approval.
  3. Implementation — writing tests, CI integration.
  4. Testing — running all levels, result analysis, bug fixing.
  5. Deployment — going live, metric monitoring, team training.

Timeline

Setting up a full test pipeline (Jest + Playwright + k6 + Lighthouse CI) from scratch: 2–4 weeks. E2E test coverage of an existing project (20–30 scenarios): 3–6 weeks. Load testing with report and recommendations: 1–2 weeks. Cost calculated individually after audit.

Ready to discuss your project? Leave a request — we will audit your current web application testing for free and propose a plan that can save up to 60% on incident costs. Get a consultation on web application testing — contact us today.