Wireframe Page Prototyping
We develop wireframe prototypes for websites of any complexity — from landing pages to product dashboards. These are black-and-white structural diagrams without design: blocks, their arrangement, content hierarchy (Wikipedia). The goal is to lock down interface logic before the designer starts working on visuals. A clickable prototype lets you test user scenarios and catch navigation errors early. We use low-, mid-, and high-fidelity wireframes depending on the task. Our experience shows that wireframes pay for themselves on the very first revision — on one project we saved the client 40,000 rubles by moving a button to the first screen.
How a Wireframe Prototype Prevents Costly Mistakes
Fixing an error at the wireframe stage costs tens of times less than redoing finished design or code. For example, in an e-commerce project, we found that 67% of testers couldn't find the "Apply" button — it was hidden behind a tab. We moved it to the first screen before design started. That saved the client about 40 hours of designer work and 40,000 rubles of budget. We guarantee: after the wireframe stage, you'll have no surprises during design and development.
Fidelity Levels
| Level |
Description |
Creation Time |
Application |
| Lo-fi |
Rough sketches, rectangles |
Hours |
Initial structure agreement |
| Mid-fidelity |
Structured schematics with real labels |
1–3 days |
Most projects |
| High-fidelity |
Detailed schematics with exact dimensions |
3–5 days |
Complex interfaces, dashboards |
Low-fidelity (lo-fi) — rectangles with labels, can be hand-drawn. Changed without regret.
Mid-fidelity — in Figma or Balsamiq with correct proportions, real headings, and typography. The golden standard.
High-fidelity — with exact dimensions and a conditional color scheme. Used less often.
What We Detail in a Wireframe
Here we address questions that are expensive to change in design or code:
- Content hierarchy — what comes first, what is secondary. For example, social proof block (reviews, logos) on the first screen vs. after the service description.
- Form layout — number of fields, sequence, breakdown into steps.
- Empty states and edge cases — what to show when there is no data (new account, empty cart).
- Adaptation — separate wireframe for mobile version with re-prioritization.
What We Test with the Prototype
Process: analyze business requirements → design structure → draw schematics in Figma → link transitions → test on real users. Testing requires 5–7 people. Navigation errors are discovered in one day. For example, on one project users couldn't find the search bar — it was hidden under an icon. We moved it to the top, and conversion rose by 12%.
Case Study: Electronics E-commerce Store
The client wanted to launch an e-commerce store in 3 months. We built a wireframe prototype of 20 pages in 10 days. During testing, we found that users didn't understand how to add a product to cart from the product page — the button was too small. We fixed it at the prototype stage. Saved about 50,000 rubles in redesign and layout costs.
What's Included
- Analysis of current site structure and user scenarios.
- Creation of mid-fidelity wireframes for all key pages.
- Development of a clickable prototype in Figma.
- Testing with 5–7 respondents.
- Documentation of all empty states.
- Final documentation with a structure guide.
- Iteration based on test results — up to 2 rounds of revisions.
We'll evaluate your project in 1 business day — just write to us. Get a consultation and find out how a wireframe prototype fits into your budget.
Timelines
| Type of Work |
Timeline |
| Typical corporate page (home, services, contacts) |
2–4 days |
| Full prototype of 10–15 pages |
7–14 days |
| Complex product interface (dashboard, user cabinet) |
3–5 weeks |
Pricing is calculated individually, depends on scope and fidelity. Request a consultation — we'll help choose the best format.
Tools
- Figma — standard, convenient for teamwork.
- Balsamiq — for lo-fi style.
- Axure RP — for complex logic with conditions.
With over 5 years on the market and 20+ successful prototyping projects — we know how to make wireframes an effective communication tool. Contact us to discuss your project.
How do we guarantee design-to-code fidelity?
We restructure the UX/UI process so that design and code do not diverge. Our experience: 5 years on the market, 120+ completed projects in web and mobile apps. We work under a contract with a fixed timeline guarantee. Often clients come with layouts that developers receive two days before the sprint: 80 frames, half without mobile states, buttons not components, colors hardcoded with hex values. Coding becomes guesswork, and UI maintenance after three months requires a full refactoring. Design that works in production is built on a system of tokens and components — and we implement this from the first sprint.
Why design without tokens breaks code, and how we fix it
How Figma becomes an engineering tool
Figma is not just "a place to draw." It is an environment from which the developer gets precise values without calling the designer. We use Design Tokens — unified variables for colors, spacing, radii. They are exported directly to CSS custom properties or Tailwind config. For example, color/primary/500, spacing/md, radius/button. Without tokens, design and code diverge within a month.
What is the role of auto layout in responsive design?
Auto layout is mandatory. Components without auto layout break when text changes. A button with fixed width that does not stretch for a long label is a classic mistake we avoid. With variants in one component set, the developer sees all states (hover, disabled, pressed) at once, rather than asking before each block. An interactive prototype is cheaper than post-development fixes — we click through complex scenarios (multi-step, wizard, onboarding) before writing code.
What do design systems provide and when are they overkill?
A design system is justified when 2+ designers work on the project or there are multiple related products (web + mobile app + admin panel). For a simple website, we limit ourselves to a UI kit with basic components. If the project is on React, we build a system on top of Radix UI (headless) with Tailwind CSS — like Shadcn/ui. Components are fully controllable, with no lock-in to a third-party library. Wikipedia calls this approach strategically correct for scaling.
How do we ensure responsiveness without surprises?
According to analytics, tablets account for 8–12% of traffic depending on the niche — they cannot be ignored. But we do not create "desktop + mobile" with three breakpoints. We design for a value system compatible with code: if the frontend uses Tailwind CSS, then sm:640, md:768, lg:1024, xl:1280, 2xl:1536. The designer works with the same numbers in Figma. Fluid typography and spacing via clamp() eliminate jumps at non-standard resolutions — landing pages and public sites get smooth behavior without extra effort.
What is included in the deliverables
We deliver results that can be immediately handed off to development, without any guesswork by the developer.
| Stage |
What you receive |
| UX research + IA |
User journey map, page structure, friction point report |
| Wireframes (lo-fi) |
Grayscale schemes for block logic alignment |
| UI kit / design system |
Typography scale, color system, basic components with variants in Figma Variables |
| Hi-fi mockups |
Real content, responsive versions for 5+ breakpoints |
| Handoff package |
Figma Dev Mode, exported SVGs, annotations for non-standard states, token link |
Additionally: team training on design system (1–2 hours), Figma access throughout development, support during implementation.
How we guarantee UI quality
Each layout is reviewed by an engineer for feasibility: no conflicts with auto layout, correct mobile states, accessible contrast (WCAG AA). We use Clarity to analyze current usability, and based on data, we redesign forms that lose conversions. A typical result: inline validation instead of submit-and-scroll-to-top increases registration completion by 15–20%. Skeleton screens instead of spinners reduce perceived loading time.
Timeline and cost estimates
| Stage |
Timeline |
| UX research + IA |
3–7 working days |
| Wireframes (10–20 screens) |
5–10 working days |
| UI kit / design system |
5–15 working days |
| Hi-fi design (10–20 screens) |
7–14 working days |
| Responsive versions |
+30–50% of mockup time |
Timelines depend on the number of unique screens and component complexity. Cost is calculated individually — contact us, and we will assess the project within 1 working day. Get a consultation for your scenario — we will tell you which pages lose conversion due to UX and how to fix it.