Web Application Testing Services

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.
Development and maintenance of all types of websites:
Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 33 of 33 servicesAll 2065 services
FAQ
Our competencies:
Development stages
Latest works
  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.png
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1212
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1161
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    852
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1041
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    822
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.png
    Website development for FIXPER company
    815

Testing: Jest, Playwright, Cypress, k6, Lighthouse

A bug found in a unit test costs a minute to fix. The same bug in production — hours of incident, client compensation, loss of trust. This is not abstract thesis: on an e-commerce project a bug in discount calculation passed manual testing, made it to production and processed 37 orders at zero price in 4 hours. An auto-test for edge cases of the calculation would sit in CI and catch it on the first push.

Jest and Unit Testing: Where It Works and Where It Doesn't

Jest is the standard for JavaScript/TypeScript. But unit tests make sense only where there's isolated logic: data transformation functions, validators, business rules, utilities.

Testing React components via Jest + Testing Library correctly for behavioral tests: "button appears after loading data", "form shows error on empty email". Snapshot tests (toMatchSnapshot) are a trap: they break on any markup change and become noise that developers update without looking.

Code coverage is a bad quality metric. 80% coverage can be achieved with tests that check nothing. Coverage shows code executed, not that it works correctly.

Vitest as alternative to Jest for Vite projects: 10–20x faster due to native ES modules without Babel transformation. For monorepos with thousands of tests the speed difference is noticeable.

Playwright: E2E Testing That Works

Cypress was the standard for E2E for a long time, but Playwright surpassed it on key metrics: native multi-tab, multi-origin, iframe support; parallel execution at test level (not just files); WebKit, Firefox, Chromium out of the box; no iframe for application — tests work in real browser.

Playwright codegen records actions and generates tests — good starting point, but generated code needs refactoring. Locators by text content are fragile: getByRole('button', { name: 'Checkout' }) is more stable than locator('.btn-primary').

Page Object Model is standard for E2E tests organization. Each page is a separate class with methods instead of direct locators in tests. When button moved from header to sidebar — change in one place, not search through all tests.

Typical problem — flaky tests. Test sometimes fails, sometimes passes. Reasons: race condition between request and render, animations without waiting for completion, dependence on external API. Solution: page.waitForResponse() instead of page.waitForTimeout(), mocking external API via page.route().

// Bad
await page.click('#submit');
await page.waitForTimeout(2000);
await expect(page.locator('.success')).toBeVisible();

// Good
await page.click('#submit');
await page.waitForResponse(resp =>
  resp.url().includes('/api/orders') && resp.status() === 201
);
await expect(page.getByRole('alert', { name: /order created/i })).toBeVisible();

Load Testing with k6

k6 is an instrument for load testing with JavaScript API. Scenarios are written as code, versioned in git, run in CI.

Three main load scenarios:

Spike test — sudden load increase: 0 → 1000 users in 30 seconds. Imitates ad campaign launch or news top placement. Shows how system behaves under sudden load and whether autoscaling responds in time.

Soak test — stable load for 2–4 hours. Reveals memory leaks, connection pool exhaustion, performance degradation over time.

Stress test — load above expected (150–200% of peak). Shows failure point and graceful degradation.

Threshold values in k6:

thresholds: {
  http_req_duration: ['p95<500', 'p99<1000'],
  http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01'],
}

p95 < 500ms means: 95% of requests respond faster than 500ms. If threshold fails — k6 exits with error code, CI pipeline falls.

Lighthouse and Core Web Vitals

Google uses Core Web Vitals in ranking. Lighthouse CLI in CI pipeline: on every deployment check that LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1, INP < 200ms.

Real problems Lighthouse finds:

  • Hero image without width/height attributes: CLS 0.35 on load (browser shifts content when image loads)
  • 2.1MB JavaScript bundle blocks parsing synchronously: INP 450ms
  • Fonts without font-display: swap: invisible text until font loads (FOIT)
  • Unoptimized hero image 4MB: LCP 8.2s

Lighthouse CI (lhci) saves metrics history and sends PR comment with degradation.

Testing Pyramid in Project

Level Tool Amount Speed
Unit Vitest/Jest Many <5 min
Integration Vitest + supertest Moderate 5–15 min
E2E Playwright Few (happy path) 10–30 min
Load k6 On schedule 30–60 min
Performance Lighthouse CI On every deploy 5 min

Work Process

Audit of current coverage, determining critical user flows for E2E, setting up CI pipeline with parallel test execution. Playwright tests run on sharded workers (4 shards = 4x speed). Load tests are separate stage, don't block feature deployments, run before releases.

Timeline

Full test pipeline setup (Jest + Playwright + k6 + Lighthouse CI) from scratch: 2–4 weeks. E2E test coverage of existing project (20–30 scenarios): 3–6 weeks. Load testing with report and recommendations: 1–2 weeks.