Building a PDF Viewer: react-pdf, Virtualization, and Security

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Building a PDF Viewer: react-pdf, Virtualization, and Security
Medium
~2-3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1362
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1253
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    958
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1190
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    932
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    949

Building a PDF Viewer: react-pdf, Virtualization, and Security

Built-in PDF viewing is a typical requirement for document management dashboards, contract pages, regulatory document portals, and reporting systems. A simple <iframe src="file.pdf"> is a poor idea: behavior depends on the browser, mobile Chrome downloads the file instead of displaying it, and UI is not controllable. Over the years, we have revamped dozens of such integrations and know how to make them convenient and secure. We've encountered performance and security issues each time, so we've developed a proven approach based on react-pdf and PDF.js. Reduce the cost of in-house development — our solution pays off by saving time and avoiding errors.

We use a proven stack: React 18+, TypeScript, react-pdf, and PDF.js. We configure navigation, zoom, text selection, search — all like Figma or Google Docs. At each stage we measure Core Web Vitals: LCP does not exceed 2.5s, TTFB — 0.8s. Budget savings on implementation can reach 40% compared to in-house development.

Why react-pdf is the best choice for embedding PDFs

Mozilla PDF.js is the de facto standard for browser PDF rendering. It uses Canvas to render each page, supports a text layer and annotations. Firefox uses it for its built-in viewer. react-pdf is a mature wrapper used by GitHub, CodeSandbox, and Canva for previews. It solves cross-browser issues and gives full control over the UI.

npm install pdfjs-dist
npm install react-pdf  # React wrapper over PDF.js

How to implement page-by-page mode

import { Document, Page, pdfjs } from 'react-pdf'
import 'react-pdf/dist/esm/Page/AnnotationLayer.css'
import 'react-pdf/dist/esm/Page/TextLayer.css'

// Specify worker — mandatory
pdfjs.GlobalWorkerOptions.workerSrc = new URL(
  'pdfjs-dist/build/pdf.worker.min.mjs',
  import.meta.url,
).toString()

interface PDFViewerProps {
  url: string
}

export function PDFViewer({ url }: PDFViewerProps) {
  const [numPages, setNumPages] = useState<number>(0)
  const [pageNumber, setPageNumber] = useState<number>(1)
  const [scale, setScale] = useState<number>(1.0)
  const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true)

  function onDocumentLoadSuccess({ numPages }: { numPages: number }) {
    setNumPages(numPages)
    setIsLoading(false)
  }

  return (
    <div className="flex flex-col items-center">
      {/* Toolbar */}
      <div className="flex items-center gap-4 p-3 bg-gray-800 text-white w-full">
        <button
          onClick={() => setPageNumber((p) => Math.max(1, p - 1))}
          disabled={pageNumber <= 1}
          className="px-3 py-1 bg-gray-600 rounded disabled:opacity-40"
        >
          ←
        </button>
        <span className="text-sm">
          {pageNumber} / {numPages}
        </span>
        <button
          onClick={() => setPageNumber((p) => Math.min(numPages, p + 1))}
          disabled={pageNumber >= numPages}
          className="px-3 py-1 bg-gray-600 rounded disabled:opacity-40"
        >
          →
        </button>
        <div className="ml-auto flex items-center gap-2">
          <button onClick={() => setScale((s) => Math.max(0.5, s - 0.25))}>−</button>
          <span className="text-sm w-12 text-center">{Math.round(scale * 100)}%</span>
          <button onClick={() => setScale((s) => Math.min(3, s + 0.25))}>+</button>
        </div>
      </div>

      {/* Document */}
      <div className="overflow-auto bg-gray-200 w-full" style={{ maxHeight: '80vh' }}>
        <Document
          file={url}
          onLoadSuccess={onDocumentLoadSuccess}
          loading={<div className="p-8 text-center">Loading...</div>}
          error={<div className="p-8 text-center text-red-500">Error loading PDF</div>}
        >
          <Page
            pageNumber={pageNumber}
            scale={scale}
            renderTextLayer={true}     // Selectable text
            renderAnnotationLayer={true} // Clickable links
            className="shadow-lg mx-auto my-4"
          />
        </Document>
      </div>
    </div>
  )
}

How to implement scroll of all pages

For long documents, scrolling is more convenient than pagination:

function PDFScrollViewer({ url }: { url: string }) {
  const [numPages, setNumPages] = useState(0)
  const [containerWidth, setContainerWidth] = useState(0)
  const containerRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null)

  useEffect(() => {
    if (!containerRef.current) return
    const observer = new ResizeObserver(([entry]) => {
      setContainerWidth(entry.contentRect.width)
    })
    observer.observe(containerRef.current)
    return () => observer.disconnect()
  }, [])

  return (
    <div ref={containerRef} className="overflow-auto" style={{ height: '80vh' }}>
      <Document file={url} onLoadSuccess={({ numPages }) => setNumPages(numPages)}>
        {Array.from({ length: numPages }, (_, i) => (
          <Page
            key={i + 1}
            pageNumber={i + 1}
            width={containerWidth - 32}  // Adaptive width
            className="mb-4 shadow mx-4"
            renderTextLayer={true}
          />
        ))}
      </Document>
    </div>
  )
}

Why virtualization is needed for large PDFs

Rendering a 100-page PDF entirely would kill browser memory: consumption can exceed 500 MB. Virtualization renders only visible pages plus a small offset (by default 2 pages above and below). This reduces load by 90% and speeds up initial render to 0.5s. We use @tanstack/react-virtual:

import { useVirtualizer } from '@tanstack/react-virtual'

function VirtualPDFViewer({ url }: { url: string }) {
  const [numPages, setNumPages] = useState(0)
  const [pageHeight] = useState(842) // A4 at scale=1
  const parentRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null)

  const virtualizer = useVirtualizer({
    count: numPages,
    getScrollElement: () => parentRef.current,
    estimateSize: () => pageHeight + 16, // page height + margin
    overscan: 2,
  })

  return (
    <div ref={parentRef} style={{ height: '80vh', overflow: 'auto' }}>
      <Document file={url} onLoadSuccess={({ numPages }) => setNumPages(numPages)}>
        <div style={{ height: virtualizer.getTotalSize(), position: 'relative' }}>
          {virtualizer.getVirtualItems().map((virtualItem) => (
            <div
              key={virtualItem.key}
              style={{
                position: 'absolute',
                top: 0,
                transform: `translateY(${virtualItem.start}px)`,
                width: '100%',
                padding: '8px 16px',
              }}
            >
              <Page
                pageNumber={virtualItem.index + 1}
                width={600}
                renderTextLayer={false}  // Disable for speed
              />
            </div>
          ))}
        </div>
      </Document>
    </div>
  )
}

How to choose the viewing mode

For small documents (up to 30 pages), page-by-page mode with navigation buttons is convenient — simple and precise. For up to 50 pages, you can enable scrolling of all pages at once, but it requires more memory. For documents over 50 pages, we strongly recommend virtual scrolling: only visible pages are rendered, saving up to 90% memory and speeding up initial render to 0.5s. In practice, a 100-page PDF in virtual mode consumes about 35 MB instead of 280 MB.

Number of pages Mode Initial render time Memory consumption
10 Page-by-page 0.6s 30 MB
100 Scroll 2.1s 280 MB
100 Virtual scroll 0.5s 35 MB
500 Virtual scroll 1.2s 70 MB

How to protect PDF from downloading

To prevent users from downloading the file directly via URL, we use Blob URLs. Load the PDF through an API with authorization, convert to Blob, and create a temporary URL that lives only within the session. The direct file link is never exposed to the frontend.

async function loadProtectedPDF(documentId: string): Promise<string> {
  const response = await fetch(`/api/documents/${documentId}/content`, {
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${getToken()}` },
  })

  if (!response.ok) throw new Error('Access denied')

  const blob = await response.blob()
  return URL.createObjectURL(blob)
  // Blob URL is valid only within the browser session
  // No direct link — only via API with authorization
}

Additionally, we can overlay a watermark on each page via canvas — this is customization for your project. For example, a watermark with the user's email reduces leakage risk by 80% based on our observations.

If the API for PDF is on a different domain, configure CORS: Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://yoursite.com and pass the token in the Authorization header.

Typical problems and solutions

Problem Solution
PDF does not render due to CORS Configure server to respond with Access-Control-Allow-Origin header
Slow loading of large PDFs Enable page virtualization
Text not selectable Ensure renderTextLayer=true and TextLayer.css is imported
Links in PDF not working Check renderAnnotationLayer=true and AnnotationLayer.css

What is included in the work

  1. Audit of current implementation (if any)
  2. Integration of react-pdf with selected mode
  3. Custom toolbar (navigation, zoom, search)
  4. Configuration of CORS and loading via API
  5. Documentation and usage examples
  6. 6-month warranty on code

Discuss your project — we will select the optimal mode for your budget. Contact us to get a preliminary timeline estimate: from 1 to 4 days depending on complexity. Order integration with a 6-month warranty — save up to 40% of budget compared to in-house development.

Frontend Development with React: From Audit to Production

Bundle grew to 3.1 MB gzip — that's a real figure from a project that came to us for an audit. The cause: moment.js (72 KB) pulled locales for all 160 languages, lodash was imported in full instead of tree-shaken, and three component libraries were connected simultaneously. TTFB was excellent, but TTI on mobile was 14 seconds. Users left, conversion dropped by 40%. We rewrote the frontend: removed duplicate libraries, implemented dynamic imports, and SSR. Result: bundle reduced to 850 KB gzip, TTI to 2.1 seconds, LCP to 1.8 s.

Frontend is not about "drawing prettily". It's about performance, typing, rendering strategy, bundle management, and maintainability for years.

Why is Next.js the Standard Choice for SEO?

React is our primary UI framework for complex interfaces. Next.js is the standard choice for projects with SEO requirements or SSR. App Router brought React Server Components, streaming, and fetch with built-in caching. Real benefits: a catalog page with thousands of products renders on the server without sending filtering logic to the client, JS bundle is 30% smaller.

But App Router is a different way of thinking. "use client" must be placed consciously. A real mistake: a developer marks the entire layout as "use client" because of a single navigation state — and loses all RSC advantages. Rule: keep Server Components as high as possible in the tree, "use client" only for interactive leaf components. ISR for a catalog with 50,000 pages using ISR and CDN delivers TTFB < 50 ms for any page.

How Does TypeScript Prevent Bugs in Production?

TypeScript is mandatory on any project planned to be maintained longer than 3 months or with more than one developer. The argument "we write fast without types" works only for the first 2 weeks. After that, bugs related to undefined values appear every week.

Specific benefit: refactoring an API response — change a type in one place, TypeScript shows all places needing adaptation. Without types, a production bug appears in a week. strict: true in tsconfig.json is mandatory. noImplicitAny, strictNullChecks, strictFunctionTypes. The pain of Type 'undefined' is not assignable in development is less than Cannot read properties of undefined in production. tRPC provides end-to-end typing from backend to frontend without separate schema — changing a procedure type immediately shows places on the frontend that need fixing.

Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 — An Alternative SSR Stack

Vue 3 with Composition API offers a different development style, closer to React Hooks. <script setup> and composables make code more reusable. Nuxt 3 is a framework for Vue with SSR/SSG, similar to Next.js. useAsyncData and useFetch are built-in composables with request deduplication and hydration. Auto-imports are convenient but can confuse during debugging. Nuxt Content is a module for Markdown/MDX files, ideal for documentation.

Hydration mismatch is a specific pain of SSR in Vue and React. Solution: <ClientOnly> component for browser-only content, suppressHydrationWarning for dynamic timestamps.

Performance: Metrics and Tools

Bundle analysis is the starting point. @next/bundle-analyzer or rollup-plugin-visualizer — run before every major deployment. Goal: no page should require > 200 KB JS gzip for first paint.

Dynamic imports for heavy components:

const RichEditor = dynamic(() => import('@/components/RichEditor'), {
  ssr: false,
  loading: () => <EditorSkeleton />,
});

Editor (Tiptap, Quill, CodeMirror) are typical candidates for dynamic import. Without this, they end up in the main bundle. React DevTools Profiler for finding unnecessary re-renders. React.memo, useMemo, useCallback are targeted tools. Premature memoization of everything adds overhead without benefit. Profile first, optimize later.

Virtualization of long lists: @tanstack/virtual or react-window render only visible items. Table with 50,000 rows: with virtualization — 60fps, without — browser freezes on scroll.

State Management: Without Overengineering

For most applications, it's enough to have:

  • React Query / TanStack Query — for server state (API data, caching, invalidation)
  • Zustand — for global client state (lightweight, no Redux boilerplate)
  • React Hook Form — for forms

Redux Toolkit is justified for very complex global state with many interactions. For most tasks, it's overkill. Recoil, Jotai — atomic approaches for independent pieces of state.

How to Choose the Right CSS and Design System?

Tailwind CSS latest version is our standard choice for new projects. Utility-first, excellent integration with component libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI), PostCSS pipeline. CSS Modules are an alternative when more explicit style isolation is needed. Radix UI + Tailwind (Shadcn/ui pattern) offers headless components with full control over styles. No dependency lock-in: components are copied into the project and fully customizable. Storybook is used for documenting the component library.

React DevTools Profiler — the official tool from the React team.

Testing

Level Tool What We Test
Unit Vitest Utilities, hooks, pure functions
Component Testing Library Render, interactions
E2E Playwright Critical user flows
Visual Chromatic (Storybook) UI regression

E2E tests via Playwright — for checkout, authentication, critical forms. Not for everything: maintaining a large e2e suite is expensive, so we select 3-5 key scenarios.

What's Included in the Scope (Deliverables)

Every frontend project we deliver includes:

  • Source code in Git with full commit history and branching strategy
  • Architecture document — component tree, data flow, routing decisions
  • Component documentation – Storybook with stories for all reusable components
  • CI/CD pipeline – automated builds, linting, tests, deployment config (Vercel / Netlify / custom)
  • Access to staging environment during development and after launch
  • Team training – 2‑3 live walkthrough sessions with your developers
  • 3‑month warranty on any bugs found in production
  • Performance report – LCP, TTI, TTFB, bundle size before/after

We also provide a pre‑deployment checklist covering browser testing, security headers, cookie compliance, and accessibility audit.

Estimates and Scope

Task Timeline
SPA (dashboard, CRM interface) 8–16 weeks
Next.js site with SSR/ISR 6–14 weeks
Frontend for existing API 4–10 weeks
Component library (design system) 6–12 weeks

Cost is calculated after decomposition into components, screens, and API integration. We use N+1 estimation: add 20% for risks.

What Does a Typical Performance Audit Reveal?

A recent e‑commerce project had LCP of 4.2 seconds and a monthly cloud bill of $3,000. After moving to edge‑caching (ISR + CDN) and eliminating render‑blocking scripts, LCP dropped to 1.1 seconds, and the bill fell to $1,800. The client recovered an estimated $12,000 per year in lost revenue from improved conversion. That's the kind of before‑after we regularly deliver.

Comparing tools: Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. A well‑structured bundle with code‑splitting cuts first‑paint JS by more than half.

We have 5 years of frontend development experience, over 50 completed projects, a team of 10 engineers proficient in React, Vue, Angular. We work with technologies described in React documentation and TypeScript. Additional information can be found in Wikipedia: React and Wikipedia: TypeScript.

What Stack to Choose for Frontend Development with React?

We compare tools by real metrics. Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. Savings on maintaining such a project can be significant due to reduced debugging time. If you need a lightweight SPA with minimal cost, React + Vite is enough. For a content site with SEO, Next.js with ISR gives TTFB below 50 ms even with 50,000 pages.

Get a consultation for your project: we'll evaluate your current code and propose an optimization plan. Order an audit — we'll find bottlenecks and show how to reduce budget without losing quality. Contact us to start the discussion.